16:00
News Story
U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, proposed a 15-week abortion ban but it will not be taken up by Republicans in Congress. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON — U.S. Senate Republicans are skeptical about a 15-week nationwide abortion ban that GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham introduced Tuesday, with some saying they want to leave the issue to state lawmakers instead of taking it up in Congress.
“I think most of the members of my conference prefer that this be dealt with at the state level,” Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said during a press conference.
Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt agreed, later saying during a brief interview “that’s best left to the states.”
Sen. Rick Scott of Florida said he plans to review the legislation, but declined to say if he’d back it, or if he supports the general idea of banning abortions nationwide after 15 weeks.
“My position is there are to be reasonable restrictions and there’ll be exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother,” Scott said.
Limited exceptions
Graham’s abortion bill would allow exceptions for rape, incest, or the life or health of the pregnant patient, though not if the diagnosis includes “psychological or emotional conditions.”
The proposed legislation would not interfere with states that have stricter restrictions in place for determining when and how a woman can legally terminate a pregnancy. But the bill, which is unlikely to become law, would pare back abortion laws in bluer states that have broader abortion laws.
Graham’s office declined to respond to a request asking if the legislation has any co-sponsors.
The bill introduced Tuesday differs from a 20-week ban the South Carolina senator introduced during the last session of Congress that amassed 47 co-sponsors, including Blunt, McConnell and Scott.
Graham’s decision to reintroduce a nationwide abortion bill Tuesday is a change of course from comments he made following the Supreme Court’s decision.
“Before 1973, the law of the land was that each state can decide the issue of life—when life begins, whether or not to have an abortion, what circumstances around having an abortion,” Graham said on “Fox News Sunday” two days after the court overturned Roe v. Wade.
“Now, what this court has done is taken us back to pre-1973 where each state can decide through their elected officials when life begins and how to treat life,” Graham added.
The Supreme Court’s opinion in the abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, said that in ending the nationwide constitutional right to abortion “the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.”
It did not specifically say that only state lawmakers, not federal lawmakers, have authority to address abortion.
Democrats slam national ban
Democrats on Tuesday rebuked Graham for introducing the legislation, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, calling the proposal “radical.”
“Proposals like the one today send a clear message from MAGA Republicans to women across the country—your body, our choice,” Schumer said.
Washington Democratic Sen. Patty Murray said Graham’s decision to introduce the measure was “chilling.”
“All their talk of ‘returning the issue to the states’ clearly isn’t worth a single cent, because Republicans have made crystal clear with this bill that they are coming for abortion rights in every single state,” Murray said.
“Regardless of who you are or where you live, Republicans think they know best when it comes to your health care decisions.”
The legislation is unlikely to get a floor vote in the Democratic-controlled U.S. Senate, and given McConnell’s comments Tuesday, it might not even get a floor vote if the GOP regains control of the chamber after the midterm elections in November.
If the bill were to come up, it would be subject to the 60-vote legislative filibuster and would likely not be able to get the bipartisan support needed to move onto final passage.
Abortion politics
Abortion has become a potentially challenging issue for Republicans heading into the midterm elections.
An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted after the court’s abortion decision showed about 53% of respondents disapproved of the conservative justices overturning Roe v. Wade. Another 30% of those polled approved and 16% said they didn’t approve or disapprove.
McConnell sought to give Republicans running in tough races plenty of runway on the issue of abortion Tuesday.
“I think every Republican senator running this year in these contested races has an answer as to how they feel about the issue. And it may be different in different states,” McConnell said.
“So I’d leave it up to our candidates, who are quite capable of handling this issue to determine for them what their response is.”
U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden blasted the proposal, saying on Twitter: “Republicans just made it clear what’s on their agenda if they take back their majority. I will never back down from fighting to protect access to health care for every single American. Full stop.”
Oregon House Majority Leader Julie Fahey, D-West Eugene, issued a statement:
“As Republicans in Congress introduce legislation to ban abortion nationwide, here in Oregon, we believe that everyone should have the right to decide if and when they have children based on what’s best for themselves and their families. Abortion remains legal and accessible here because of the work that Oregon Democrats have done to protect and expand access to reproductive health care throughout our state.
“Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, anti-abortion politicians have pushed a coordinated and aggressive agenda to ban abortion outright at the state level and now at the national level. We’ve seen over and over again how these abortion bans in Red states have put peoples’ lives and well-being at risk. And yet every year during Oregon’s legislative sessions, Oregon Republicans introduce anti-abortion bills. Next session, I’m sure, will be no different.
“Oregon House Democrats remain committed to protecting access to abortion because every Oregonian should be free to make their own decisions about their future, without political interference.”
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site.
Related News
